"Rangel's Rule" Legislation Would Eliminate Late Fees On Past Due Taxes. Hey Us Little People Can Dream Can't We?!

1-29-09

Congressman John Carter, R-Texas, has just come up with what I consider a brilliant idea and I’m surprised it took so long for someone to think of it! For us mere mortals that are pretty much sick and tired of these rat faced politicians sticking it to us for screwing up while they just fat dance around the law here is a bit of levity that should put a brief but well deserved smile on your mug.

Rep. Carter introduced a bill Wednesday to eliminate all IRS penalties and interest for paying taxes past due.

The legislation calls for the creation of what he calls the, “Rangel Rule,” — drawing attention to the recent legal issues of House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., enabling citizens who fail to pay taxes on time to do so later with no additional fees.

Rangel, who writes the country’s tax policies, acknowledged last fall that he failed to pay thousands in real estate taxes for rental income he earned from a property in the Dominican Republic.

As of September 2008 the Harlem Democrat reportedly paid back more than $10,000 in taxes but that did not include any IRS penalties.

“Your citizens back home should have the same rights and benefits that come to you as a member of congress. You shouldn’t be treated any differently under the law than your citizens back home,” Carter said.

He added that citizens should receive the “same courtesy” that the IRS is allegedly granting Rangel and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who also recently acknowledged a failure to pay taxes.

Amen Congressman…amen!

…read the whole article here >

Off the Wall , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Obama Reached Out To Al Qaida Long Before He Became President? Oh Really Now?

1-28-09

Now this seems a just a little bit odd to me.

Long before he was elected as U.S. President numero 44 Barack Hussein Obama was negotiating behind the scenes with “Arab intermediaries” in an attempt to establish a pre-presidential dialog with the likes of that fun loving roving band of terrorists al-Qaida. That’s according to what worldtribune.com (via Geostrategy-Direct.com.) claims in an article published online today.

Barack Obama was working with Arab intermediaries to establish an unofficial dialogue with Al Qaida long (I wonder how long…..long is? -ed.) before his election as the 44th U.S. president, according to a report in the upcoming weekly edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com. Al Qaida has offered what has been described as a truce in exchange for a U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, according to the report.

Obama has deemed the U.S. reconciliation with the Muslim world, including Iran, as his main foreign policy goal, sources quoted in the report said. The president has been aided by several Persian Gulf Arab Muslims with ties to Al Qaida’s leadership in Pakistan, they said.

Continue reading »

Obama And His Administration , , , , , , Leave a comment

Ann Coulter Throat Punches The Incessant Liberal Victimhood Mentality

1-28-09

Man I just love to read stuff from Ann Coulter. Say what you want about the woman but when she puts pen to paper it becomes some magical stuff. Follow along as she calls the liberals out on their constant whining about always being a victim.

I notice that liberals have not challenged the overall thesis of my rocketing bestseller, “Guilty: Liberal ‘Victims’ and Their Assault on America,” which is that liberals always play the victim in order to advance, win advantages and oppress others.

I guess that would be hard to do when the corrupt Democratic governor of Illinois is running around comparing himself to Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi.

Indeed, you can’t turn on the TV without seeing some liberal playing victim to score the game-winning point.

Caroline Kennedy tried to Bigfoot her way into New York’s Senate seat while being bathed in the Kennedy light of eternal victimhood. The New York Times began a profile of Caroline by quoting an average citizen who “turns almost maternally protective” upon hearing Caroline’s name, mentioning the assassination of her father — nearly half a century ago.

…and my favorite part,

“…but ironically, Obama’s father is from Africa: He never suffered from the ancient policies that, today, give his son Victim Gold. To the contrary, if Obama’s African relatives had anything to do with slavery, it was on the business end.”

read the whole article here…>

Off the Wall , , , , , , , , , , , 2 Comments

Obama Versus Iran's Ahmadinejad. Now Taking Bets On Who Blinks First

1-28-09

Give these Iranian whacks an inch….

…and they will very soon start demanding a mile as displayed here by emboldened Iranian president and scuzzy looking little dirtbag Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Continue reading »

U.S. Politics , , , , , , Leave a comment

H.R. 2458, The 'Enumerated Powers Act.' Its Time Has Come, Let's Put An End To The Madness!

H. R. 2458

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

A BILL

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Enumerated Powers Act’.

SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW.

(a) Constitutional Authority for This Act- This Act is enacted pursuant to the power granted Congress under article I, section 8, clause 18, of the United States Constitution and the power granted to each House of Congress under article I, section 5, clause 2, of the United States Constitution.

(b) Constitutional Authority Statement Required- Chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 102 the following new section:

`Sec. 102a. Constitutional authority clause

`Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and definite statement of the constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act. The failure to comply with this section shall give rise to a point of order in either House of Congress. The availability of this point of order does not affect any other available relief.’

(c) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 102 the following new item:

`102a. Constitutional authority clause.’.
Continue reading »

Economy, U.S. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 Comment

Some Barack Obama Memorabilia Guaranteed To "Love You Long Time"

1-26-09

In today’s you-can’t-make-this-stuff-up-department….just-a-regular-guy presents the one, the only (as far as we know) and more than likely, the unauthorized……

Barack Hussein Obama adult toy thingy!

obamadildothingy

Evidently a hit with many Republicans (according to the website) Joe “that plumber” says, “get yours before something else beside the wealth gets spread all over em!”

Humor , , , Leave a comment

Obama Lied, CNN's Campbell Brown Cried.

1-25-09

Just the other night you heaped praise??? How about CNN, for the last TWO YEARS heaped praise on this fraud!!

Notice how Campbell Brown is sooo wistful, full of genuine angst, that her fella let her down? Well I have an idea Campbell (what the hell kind of name is that for a woman anyway?) how about you join us in a sing along?
Continue reading »

Obama And His Administration , , , , , , 1 Comment

Nancy Pelosi Says "Family Planning" (Contraception AND Abortion?) Helps Economy

1-25-09

One day after the Vatican blasted Mr. Obama for his decision to resume abortion funding for international groups with U.S. taxpayer money House Speaker Nancy Pelosi sat down with George Stephanopoulos on the ABC This Week show and announced to the country that we are be much better off with birth control funding in the “stimulus package” spending spree than we are without it.

Does she really mean the more children that are aborted, especially those who’s mothers are on government assistance, the better off the economy will be? I mean I am all for people not having kids if they can’t afford to provide for them properly and I believe most people feel that way. That said the “family planning” she speaks of certainly does include abortion services and if Obama is willing to use taxpayer funds to provide for abortion services in other countries it would not be a stretch to believe the same game plan would soon be in effect for this country.
Continue reading »

U.S. Politics , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

First It Was Free Digital Boxes For TVs, Now It's Free Cell Phones For Welfare Recipients. Can Free Home Theatre Systems Be Far Behind?

1-25-09

“…and so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.”

-John F. Kennedy January 20, 1961

Whatever happened to sanity in America?

Little wonder why government from the top down in this country is going broke and running eye popping deficits.

It’s seems the state of Alabama is going to have to wait awhile before it can start a new program to distribute “free” cell phones and service to the state’s “poor.” The hitch seems to be a federal requirement that the phones must be compatible with 9-1-1 systems throughout the state which really bums the cell phone company pushing the deal that stands to make them a nice profit.

TracFone Wireless is the company doing their best to get their product into the hands of people that will no doubt enjoy the free phone along with 68 minutes of free yacking and texting time per month. When the folks burn through the 68 minutes they are subsequently charged 20 cents a minute surely resulting in making these folks even “more poorer.” No worries for TracFone though as it will all add up nicely on top of the 10 bucks a month the government pays them per phone issued.
Continue reading »

Off the Wall , , , , , , , 1 Comment

Obama Orders Missile Strikes In Pakistan Killing 22 People, Reportedly Women And Children Among Them

1-25-09

In an effort to appease all of the anti-war protesters that helped vote him into office (sarcasm intended) Mr. Obama ordered Predator missile strikes into tribal regions of Pakistan along the Afghanistan border last Friday killing “at least 22 people” many reported to be women and children.

Barack Obama gave the go-ahead for his first military action yesterday, missile strikes against suspected militants in Pakistan which killed at least 18 people.

Four days after assuming the presidency, he was consulted by US commanders before they launched the two attacks. Although Obama has abandoned many of the “war on terror” policies of George Bush while he was president, he is not retreating from the hunt for Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaida leaders.

(gee, nice cover for Obama from the journalist huh? Seems Mr. Obama gets to have it BOTH ways…)

In addition it was reported that a separate raid by American military personnel in Afghanistan “killed 16 civilians” prompting condemnation from Afghan president, Hamid Karzai.

On Sunday, the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, condemned a separate US operation within Afghanistan that he said killed 16 Afghan civilians, prompting hundreds of villagers to demonstrate against the American military.

The US said the raid, on Saturday in Laghman province, killed 15 armed militants, including a woman with an RPG. But Afghan officials said they killed civilians, including two women and three children. In Laghman’s capital, hundreds of protesters demanded an end to overnight raids.

Karzai warned the killing of innocent Afghans during US military operations “is strengthening the terrorists”. He also announced that his government had sent Washington a draft agreement that seeks to give Afghanistan more oversight over US military operations. The document has also been sent to Nato headquarters.

Mr. Obama, a well known and long time military strategist, (sarcasm intended) has claimed that the previous administration had it all wrong when they decided to take military action against Saddam Hussein and Iraq saying we should have been in Afghanistan from the outset in our “war on terror.”
Continue reading »

U.S. Politics , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment