The Men Behind Barack Obama

I have been watching with interest those that have been pursuing this Obama birth certificate goose chase hoping if it will eventually sink in with these good people that he has been selected for the position of POTUS by a far more powerful force than the mere mortal voters-read useful idiots-of this country. While many are well aware Obama is nothing more than a puppet of the George Soros, David Rockerfeller and Zbigniew Brzezinksi group of world event manipulators few may know just how far back the connection may really be with at least one of these men.

Although he refuses to discuss or chronicle this (among many other) part of his life Obama attended Columbia University in New York from 1981-1983 majoring in political science. According to the recollection of one of his professors, Michael Baron, his senior thesis revolved around the concept of Soviet nuclear disarmament. In a July ’08 interview with msnbc Baron had this to say,

“My recollection is that the paper was an analysis of the evolution of the arms reduction negotiations between the Soviet Union and the United States,” Baron said in an e-mail. “At that time, a hot topic in foreign policy circles was finding a way in which each country could safely reduce the large arsenal of nuclear weapons pointed at the other … For U.S. policy makers in both political parties, the aim was not disarmament, but achieving deep reductions in the Soviet nuclear arsenal and keeping a substantial and permanent American advantage. As I remember it, the paper was about those negotiations, their tactics and chances for success. Barack got an A.”

What was Brzezinski 1950 college master’s thesis while attending McGill University? It happened to focus on the various nationalities within the Soviet Union’s empire. Interestingly enough Brzezinski was on the faculty of Columbia University from 1960 to 1989, where he headed up the Institute on Communist Affairs. I wonder what the odds are of Obama and Brzezinski hooking up while both were on campus at Columbia during the same time period? Meanwhile everyone keeps chasing around in circles this Bill Ayers angle.

Sponsors... article continues below...

Brzezinski is a past member of the board of directors of Amnesty International, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Atlantic Council, and the National Endowment for Democracy.

He was the founder and a former director of the Trilateral Commission, now serving only on the executive committee, and was formerly a board member of Freedom House. He has also been linked with a secret society known as the Illuminati.

He is currently a trustee and counselor for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a board member for the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus, on the advisory board of America Abroad Media, and on the advisory board of Partnership for a Secure America.

In 1997 Brzezinski released a book, “THE GRAND CHESSBOARD – American Primacy And It’s Geostrategic Imperatives” and the opening words are,

“Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power.” (Eurasia generally considered to be all of the territory east of Germany and Poland, stretching all the way through Russia and China to the Pacific Ocean. It includes the Middle East and most of the Indian subcontinent-ed.) …The last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key arbiter of Eurasian power relations but also as the world’s paramount power. The defeat and collapse of the Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of a Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power…

Continuing with more excerpts from his book Brzezinski makes it clear that world dominance by ‘America’ as the first, only and probably the last true superpower the planet will ever see, is the goal of those powerful people ‘behind the scenes.’

“It is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book.”

“How America ‘manages’ Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world’s three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa’s subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world’s central continent. About 75 per cent of the world’s people live in Eurasia, and most of the world’s physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world’s known energy resources.”

“Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being. (such as a well timed and orchestrated September 11th or financial “crisis”??-ed.)The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization.” (we are not a democracy however the point being this country’s ideals and what we stand for run counter to this world domination or ‘imperial mobilization’ the author speaks of-ed.)

“The world’s energy consumption is bound to vastly increase over the next two or three decades. Estimates by the U.S. Department of energy anticipate that world demand will rise by more than 50 percent between 1993 and 2015, with the most significant increase in consumption occurring in the Far East. The momentum of Asia’s economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea.”

“Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.”(read-“the founding basis of the United States and what she once stood for is becoming more diluted every day with the thousands of immigrants that pour into the country trying to escape the tyranny and oppression of their homelands….yet these immigrants refuse to assimilate to the culture and customs of this nation. Further it will take one hell of a manufactured crisis to get a large majority of inhabitants on the same page to support a government response to any perceived “crisis.”-ed.)

“The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America’s engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.”(kinda like 9-11, right?-ed.)

“For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia… Now a non-Eurasian power is preeminent in Eurasia – and America’s global primacy is directly dependent on how long and how effectively its preponderance on the Eurasian continent is sustained.”

“America’s withdrawal from the world or because of the sudden emergence of a successful rival – would produce massive international instability. It would prompt global anarchy.”

“Two basic steps are thus required: first, to identify the geostrategically dynamic Eurasian states that have the power to cause a potentially important shift in the international distribution of power and to decipher the central external goals of their respective political elites and the likely consequences of their seeking to attain them;… second, to formulate specific U.S. policies to offset, co-opt, and/or control the above…”

“Henceforth, the United States may have to determine how to cope with regional coalitions that seek to push America out of Eurasia, thereby threatening America’s status as a global power.”

“Uzbekistan, nationally the most vital and the most populous of the central Asian states, represents the major obstacle to any renewed Russian control over the region. Its independence is critical to the survival of the other Central Asian states, and it is the least vulnerable to Russian pressures.”

[Referring to an area he calls the “Eurasian Balkans” and a 1997 map in which he has circled the exact location of the current conflict – describing it as the central region of pending conflict for world dominance] “Moreover, they [the Central Asian Republics] are of importance from the standpoint of security and historical ambitions to at least three of their most immediate and more powerful neighbors, namely Russia, Turkey and Iran, with China also signaling an increasing political interest in the region. But the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural gas and oil reserves is located in the region, in addition to important minerals, including gold.”

“…an Islamic revival – already abetted from the outside not only by Iran but also by Saudi Arabia – is likely to become the mobilizing impulse for the increasingly pervasive new nationalisms, determined to oppose any reintegration under Russian – and hence infidel – control.”

“It follows that America’s primary interest is to help ensure that no single power comes to control this geopolitical space and that the global community has unhindered financial and economic access to it.”

“America is now the only global superpower, and Eurasia is the globe’s central arena. Hence, what happens to the distribution of power on the Eurasian continent will be of decisive importance to America’s global primacy and to America’s historical legacy.”

“Without sustained and directed American involvement, before long the forces of global disorder could come to dominate the world scene. And the possibility of such a fragmentation is inherent in the geopolitical tensions not only of today’s Eurasia but of the world more generally.”

“The most immediate task is to make certain that no state or combination of states gains the capacity to expel the United States from Eurasia or even to diminish significantly its decisive arbitration role.”

As much as the anti-war liberals that voted for Obama on his promise to pull troops out of Iraq as soon as he turned the doorknob to the Oval Office hate to hear it he is going to follow the playbook handed to him by Brzezinski et al. and that is just the way it is going to be. Whether you swing right or hang left the end game is always going to be the same it’s the journey that gets us there that will be much different. The power elites just so happen to think their patience has paid off and they feel they finally have the just right guy at just the right time to do their bidding.

This entry was posted in Obama And His Administration.

2 Responses to The Men Behind Barack Obama

  1. Pingback: Barack Obama's Secrets To Success. |

  2. Pingback: Obama’s Biography Is A State Secret In Canada Too

Leave a Reply