Mainstream Media Refuses Paid Advertising Challenging Obama's Eligibility For POTUS

1-09-09

Why would the national television news media, CNBC, MSNBC, Headline News, CNN and Fox among others, refuse to accept paid advertising challenging the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States? As a matter of fact why is it that conservative talk radio heavyweights like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Mark Levin have not and will not touch this issue with a ten foot pole? I mean there have been lawsuits filed up the wazoo all over the country including several that have made it all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Most have been rejected but there are some that are currently pending.

This isn’t news? This isn’t worthy of coverage? A president-elect of this country being sued to prove his citizenship status while he spends hundreds of thousands in lawyer fees to avoid doing so….and this isn’t newsworthy? I don’t care how crazy this situation may seem it is still news and the people of this country should be made aware of what is going on whether these media outlets think there is merit to this issue or not.

Seriously, we have to rely on “The Globe” tabloid magazine to bring this stuff to America’s attention? Of course it was The Globe’s sister publication, The National Enquirer that popped the John Edwards love child story which the lamestream media wouldn’t touch lest it cast a pall over the Democratic Party and hinder their chances in the last election.

Sponsors... article continues below...

The aforementioned group of media from the TV networks to the talk show people, every one of them, had no problem whatsoever talking about the idiotic story concerning Sarah Palin’s son Trig actually being her daughter’s child. Some more than others but they all brought up the bogus rumor. In fact this garbage is still being played out by some nutty whackjobs.

So why is virtually everyone laying off the story about Barack Hussein Obama and the possibility that he does not qualify to serve as Commander-in-Chief because he may not be a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution?

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution contains the clause:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Keep in mind the terms “natural born citizen” and “U.S. citizen” do NOT mean the same thing even though the intellectually lazy and those with an agenda would claim they do.

This is a situation that could quickly and permanently be put to rest by Mr. Obama if he chose to do so. Why wouldn’t he? I’ve yet to be convinced of this “Obama is not a natural born citizen” tact mainly because there is absolutely no concrete proof otherwise but I am open to whatever verifiable evidence can or may be uncovered to prove otherwise. One thing is for sure this is certainly no way for Obama to start out his first term as president.

This entry was posted in Obama And His Administration.

Leave a Reply